UX Case Study

Dearborn Decide — a youth-voice platform for the City of Dearborn.

Turning a fundraising problem into a youth-voice platform.

Overview

My Role: UX Research & Product Design

Team: 4 designers

Client: City of Dearborn

Course: SI 538, University of Michigan

Timeline: 14 weeks · Sept–Dec 2025

Dearborn Decide reframes a civic fundraising challenge into a platform for young residents to surface ideas, react to community priorities, and see how city decisions move forward.

The Problem

“Young residents don’t donate, engage, or enter the donor pipeline. How might we inspire them to give?”

The City’s brief focused on donations, but early evidence suggested the deeper issue was not generosity — it was trust, relevance, and whether young residents felt invited into civic decision-making.

Research

We combined 95+ survey responses, expert interviews, and in-person research to understand how young Dearborn residents think about giving, participation, and city trust.

70%

had donated in the past year — just not to the City

46.4%

felt disconnected from the city

The Reframe

From: “How do we get young people to donate?”

To: “How do we build trust and belonging first?”

Exploring Solutions

We diverged into five early concepts, then converged on the idea that best connected civic participation, transparency, and low-friction action.

Concept 02

Early idea sketch

Concept 03

Early idea sketch

Concept 04

Early idea sketch

Concept 05

Early idea sketch

The Solution — Dearborn Decide

Dearborn Decide gives each young resident a simple way to propose ideas, react to priorities, and see how participation shapes the City’s annual decision cycle.

1 Free Idea

Every resident starts with a no-cost civic proposal.

1 Free Reaction

Residents can support, question, or refine community ideas.

Buy More

Optional paid actions turn participation into civic giving.

Transparency builds trust

Young residents need to see where ideas go, who evaluates them, and what happens next.

Visible ownership creates belonging

Participation feels meaningful when residents can recognize their voice in public outcomes.

Web mockup 01

Desktop web screen · 16:9

Web mockup 02

Desktop web screen · 16:9

Web mockup 03

Desktop web screen · 16:9

Web mockup 04

Desktop web screen · 16:9

View Figma prototype

The Annual Cycle

Jan–Sept · Open

Oct–Dec · Evaluate

January · Announce

Annual cycle diagram · 16:9

Add a visual diagram of the civic decision cycle.

Testing & Iteration

Prototype testing helped us simplify the action model, clarify how ideas move through review, and make ownership feel visible without adding friction.

Iteration 01 · 16:9

Before / after flow, screen, or usability finding.

Iteration 02 · 16:9

Before / after flow, screen, or usability finding.

Iteration 03 · 16:9

Optional third testing artifact or final revision.

Impact

Youth Voice

Creates a civic channel that starts with listening.

Transparency

Shows how ideas are reviewed, prioritized, and answered.

Stronger Community Relations

Turns giving into an ongoing relationship with the City.

Greater Resources

Connects participation to a clearer donor pipeline.

Expo poster / video · 16:9

Place the final Expo poster, presentation still, or video thumbnail here.

Reflection

This project taught me to look past the first brief and listen for the problem underneath. The strongest product direction emerged when we shifted from asking for donations to designing conditions for trust, ownership, and belonging.